The first fundamental axiom of Dasism is that reality is an emergent, entangled mess.
Emergence is when a complex system has properties that appear at the system level that can't be explained by the interactions of the components alone.
It is the process by which the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts.
Emergent entanglement highlights the complex interplay between systems and their components.
It describes how emergent properties—those arising from the interaction of a system's parts—can then influence those very parts in ways that create new dynamics via emergent reciprocation.
There are leverage points where small interactions can cause great impacts. For example, in social networks, a popular idea can gain traction exponentially as more people adopt and share it, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.
The emergent property of popularity feeds back into the network to drive further adoption.
These occur where the system's emergent behavior stabilizes or limits further change. For instance, in ecosystems, predator-prey relationships often exhibit dampening effects.
If prey populations grow too large, predators thrive, which in turn reduces the prey population, stabilizing the system over time.
Recognize that nothing exists in isolation. Whether it's a decision, a behavior, or a phenomenon, its meaning and impact are shaped by its connections. Embrace systems thinking to see the bigger picture and abandon the expectation that reality presents itself in incremental facts.
In complex systems, small changes can have outsized effects. Identify feedback loops where your actions could amplify positive outcomes or mitigate harmful ones, and focus your energy where it matters most.
Understand the complexity of entangled systems, but don't let it paralyze you. Use simplified models as scaffolding to navigate complexity, always remembering they're approximations of a richer reality.
In an entangled reality, change is constant. Rather than seeking permanent solutions, develop adaptable strategies that evolve as systems and their feedback loops shift over time.
DAS NIEL
As stated already, the only constant in reality is change. By making authoritative certainty the aim of the pursuit of Truth, western society has created an inevitable revolution cycle where dogma accumulates until it becomes so restrictive to the present moment that its rejected, often violently.
Critical realism is the fundamental perspective that requires intellectual humility from us regardless of what we believe for the moment.
Scientific realism and logical positivism fundamentally seeks something the Truth may never be able to provide humanity; certainty.
As more and more of reality is demonstrated to be emergent and chaotic, it's time to recognize the pursuit of any sort of dogmatic realism for what it is; a means for humanity to cope with its anxiety of the unknown.
Science has never claimed to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt, just within the parameters of various experiments and with the bias from having conclusions up front in publications, creating an implicit tendency towards the proposed interpretation.
While realism and empiricism have a place in the toolkit humanity uses to determine truth, to act like they are the only acceptable lens creates a massive blind spot that is readily exploited by corrupt authorities.
It's difficult to say if the sole draw towards reductionism is the sense of control it offered, or if people can't see beyond the results and realize that we can have close understandings and still engineer plenty through sheer iterative effort.
Regardless, complexity science and emergent phenomenon have invalidated the overly controlled and absolutists views of the world. We need to pursue relational, iterative science. We don't need incremental, absolute detail about everything. Reductionism becomes a rabbit hole in this sense.
Reality doesn’t demand absolute certainty. Allow yourself the freedom to explore ideas without committing to them as truths.
When decisions require critical action, hold those ideas to rigorous standards of verification before treating them as beliefs.
In an entangled world, certainty can be useful but is rarely absolute. Treat it as a provisional guide rather than the end of inquiry. This lets you act decisively when needed while staying open to refining your understanding.
It’s possible to explore ideas without endorsing them. View inquiry as a journey of curiosity, while reserving commitment for beliefs that withstand rigorous scrutiny.
Instead of forcing reality into rigid frameworks to "get it right the first time", recognize that understanding evolves through experience and reflection. Build decisions on solid ground, but don’t fear shifting landscapes as your knowledge deepens.
Completing a critical realism perspective, it's worth noting that empiricism is not any less important. If anything it is more refined and empowered to help society solve problems more directly.
We don't need to need to know the picture on the puzzle box to know and prove that some pieces go together with relative certainty. And doing so helps us mitigate risks when needed as we openly explore curiosity.
Copyright © 2025 Das Niel
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.