Meta-religion operates within the critical realist perspective that no one can know for sure what's going on. Other than that, it has the same moral relativistic questions to answer as secular humanism.
Dasism also highlights secondary moral drivers based on its Paradigm.
Moral absolutism insists on universal truths that classify beliefs, actions, and people as inherently "good" or "bad".
By reducing the complexity of human behavior and values into a rigid good/bad dichotomy, absolutism disregards the diverse context, cultures, and experiences that shape morality.
This approach forces individuals and groups to either align with a singular moral framework or be labeled as "bad," fostering division and hostility.
True peace requires moving beyond dichotomies to embrace the emergent, contextual nature of morality.
Moral decisions depend on context, including cultural norms, situational factors, and personal experiences.
Instead of seeking universal "right" answers, strive to understand the conditions that make a particular action or belief seem moral within its context.
This approach fosters empathy and reduces the tendency to impose one's own moral framework on others.
Use open dialogue and shared experiences to explore common ground between differing moral perspectives.
Evaluate moral decisions based on their real-world effects rather than abstract principles of "right" or "wrong."
Ask whether an action promotes well-being, minimizes harm, or supports long-term harmony.
By focusing on pragmatic outcomes, moral relativism becomes a tool for practical decision-making rather than a source of paralyzing indecision or conflict.
While you may be committed to certain moral outcomes, a flexible approach is the best means of accomplishing your goals.
DAS NIEL
Safety is a common goal that unifies people. But the important thing to note about safety is that it can never be absolute.
The best you can hope for is that things are harder to mess with than it is worth doing so. Society needs to negotiate the balance between appropriate effort and unavoidable misfortune.
The best deterrent is awareness. If everyone knew how to accomplish what they wish relative to what everyone else was up to, bad behavior would be deterred by virtue of honest collaboration.
The issue in modern society is selective awareness- only certain things are made public as regulated by corrupted centralization.
Freedom can refer to many things, but in the context of Dasism, it means the right to self-determination.
Meaningful freedom means that people have the right to determine for themselves what they believe, what is best for them in life, and how they wish to pursue it, so long as it doesn't harm others.
If the aim of the rules are to keep people safe, then they shouldn't be used in ways that endanger people.
Making exceptions isn't about avoiding accountability, it's about accepting the nuance of reality and how all of humanity's frameworks fall short- even the ones that dictate law & order.
Moral superiority, far from being a virtuous ideal, often serves as a justification for oppression. In a world that aspires to be free and democratic, the assertion that one set of morals is inherently "better" undermines the very principles of freedom and self-determination.
Democracy is not about imposing what is deemed the "best" by a select group; it is about creating space for the best to emerge naturally, through the diverse contributions of individuals freely pursuing their own paths.
History shows that the greatest atrocities—wars, genocides, and systemic oppression—have been committed in the name of moral superiority. When one group claims exclusive insight into "good" or "right," it feels justified in silencing, marginalizing, or even eliminating others who do not conform.
True democracy and freedom require humility in moral discourse. Only by allowing individuals and communities to explore their own beliefs and practices can we create a world where genuine progress and harmony thrive.
As counter-intuitive as the claim may seem, anarchy helps resolve moral disputes. Anarchy is merely the opposite of hierarchy, and it's the power of one entity to arbitrarily dismiss the morality of another that leads to the most conflict. Society should aim to balance decision making and social equity, not concentrate it as much as possible.
Humanity must use morality as a tool for presence and preparation, not as a reason to get stuck in the past. While restitution may be valid and should be pursued, retribution is an often unnecessary rationalization of vengeance. By focusing on proactive morality, we can avoid perpetuating trauma endlessly.
The fundamental problem with crime is that it ruins our ability to be present and enjoy the moment. We end up plotting vengeance or fearing retribution depending on the side of the fence we are on, and both remove us from our ability to engage with reality as it exists now. How we respond to crime should facilitate the restoration of presence, not the further abandonment of it.
All of us return to the same pool of awareness when we pass. We get to see the true nature of how everything came to be and go, both from our own perspectives and from the perspectives of all other people and conscious life.
Since we all share the same perspective, there's no point in pursuing the experience of others, lying and missing out an lived opportunities, or trying to harm others and make our collective experience worse.
Dasism doesn't project that anyone but us will be judging how we're doing when we pass and re-obtain complete awareness independent of human bias. As the nature of reality and our lives is fully revealed to us, we make our own assessments on whether it was a life well lived on behalf of the Universal Soul.
Copyright © 2025 Das Niel
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.